Skip to main content
  • Aristotle's Logic 
  • Stoic Logic 
  • Hellenistic Logic 
  • Medieval Logic 
  • Modern Logic 
  • Contemp. Logic 
  • Intercultural Logic 
  • Historians 

Digital Quadrivium Project by Raul Corazzon: four websites

Logica
Ontologia
Rhetorica
Bibliographia
Logica
Ontologia
Rhetorica
Bibliographia

History of Logic from Aristotle to Gödel (www.historyoflogic.com)

by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: rc@ontology.co

  • Skip to main content

 

Digital Quadrivium Project by Raul Corazzon: four websites

Logica: History of Logic

Logica

 

Ontologia: Theory and History of Ontology

 

Rhetorica: Theory and History of Rhetoric

 

Bibliographia: Bibliographies on religion and philosophy

 

  • Click to show the MENU
  • Aristotle
  • Stoics
  • Hellenistic
  • Medieval
  • Modern
  • Contemporary
  • Intercultural Logic
  • Historians
  • Click to hide the MENU

History of Logic from Aristotle to Gödel

A.I. Chatbots on the Digital Quadrivium Project

This website can also be downloaded as ebook or PDF:

Read online  Download

Search in the four Websites:

 

Bibliography on the Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's De Interpretatione

Bibliography

  1. Adamson, Peter. 2006. "The Arabic Sea Battle: al-Fārābī on the Problem of Future Contingents." Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie no. 88:163–188.

    Abstract: "Ancient commentators like Ammonius and Boethius tried to solve Aristotle’s “sea battle argument” in On Interpretation 9 by saying that statements about future contingents are “indefinitely” true or false. They were followed by al-Farabi in his commentary on On Interpretation. The article sets out two possible interpretations of what “indefinitely” means here, and shows that al-Farabi actually has both conceptions: one applied in his interpretation of Aristotle, and another that he is forced into by the problem of divine foreknowledge. It also explains the relevance of al-Farabi’s remarks as a link between the non-statistical modal theories of Philo and Avicenna."

  2. Andrews, Robert. 2003. "The Modistae and John Duns Scotus's Quaestiones super Perihermeneias." In Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition, edited by Braakhuis, Henk Antonius and Kneepkens, Corneille Henri, 67–83. Groningen: Ingenium Publishers.

  3. Baffioni, Carmela, and Nasti de Vincentis, Mauro. 1981. Il capitolo 9 del De interpretatione di Aristotele nel commentario di Al-Farabi. Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale.

    Premessa

    Parte Prima: Carmela Baffioni, Lo šarḥ li-kitābi Arisṭūṭālīs fī'l-'ibāra: traduzione e interpretazione del cap. 9

    Parte seconda: Mauro Nasti De Vincentis: Interpretazione di al-Fārābī e interpretazione «farabiana». A proposito del commento di al-Fārābī a De interpretatione 9

    Appendice alla Parte seconda:: Emanuela Galanti: Necessità e onnitemporalità in alcuni testi aristotelici.

  4. Bertuzzi, Giovanni. 1993. "Il commento di S. Tommaso al Peri Hermeneias di Aristotele e la dottrina del significato." Divus Thomas no. 95:32–48.

  5. Biard, Joël. 2003. "Le statut des énocés dans les commentaires du Peri hermeneias de Gautier Burley." In Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition, edited by Braakhuis, Henk Antonius and Kneepkens, Corneille Henri, 103–118. Groningen: Ingenium Publishers.

  6. Black, Deborah. 1992. "Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias in Medieval Latin and Arabic Philosophy: Logic and the Linguistic Arts." In Aristotle and His Medieval Interpreters, edited by Bosley, Richard and Tweedale, Martin, 25–83. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Supplementary volume 17 to Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

    "This paper compares the views of a number of Arabic and thirteenth-century Latin commentators on Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias on the status of logic as a linguistic art and its relation to grammar. The discussion considers the commentators' general positions on the logician's treatment of linguistic topics, and their attempts to reconcile the dual claim of logic to be both a linguistic and a rational art. These general principles are then traced through the treatment of a number of particular themes in the Peri Hermeneias's linguistic sections: The definition of the noun,the cases of the noun, and the indefinite or infinite noun (i.e., of the form non-X). The article concludes that, although there are basic differences between the Latin and Arabic traditions stemming from the presence in the Latin world of a philosophical theory of grammar, authors in both traditions are adamant that a balance must be maintained between the linguistic and rational characterizations of logic."

  7. Bos, Egbert Peter. 1987. "The Theory of the Proposition According to John Duns Scotus' Two Commentaries on Aristotle's Perihermeneias." In Logos and Pragma. Essays on the Philosophy of Language in Honour of Professor Gabriel Nuchelmans, edited by Rijk, Lambertus Marie de and Braakhuis , Henk A.G., 121–139. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers.

  8. Braakhuis, Henk Antonius, and Kneepkens, Corneille Henri, eds. 2003. Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition. Groningen: Ingenium Publishers.

    Table of Contents V; Preface VII; Introduction IX-XLI; Yukio wakuma: William of Champeaux and the Introductiones 1; Sten Ebbesen: Questions and Sophismata: tracking Peter of Auvergne 31; Alan Perreiah: Orality and literacy in the De interpretatione tradition 51; Robert Andrews: The Modistae and John Duns Scotus's Quaestiones super Perihermeneias 67; Claude Panaccio: Debates on mental language in the early Fourteenth century 85; Joël Biard: Le statut des énoncés dans les commentaires du Peri hermeneias de Gautier Burley 103; M. Kaufmann: The discussion on the nature of the concept in Ockham's Perihermeneias Commentary 119; Mieczyslaw H. Markowski: Der Kommentar des Peter Wysz von Polen zu De interpretatione des Aristoteles 135; Gino Roncaglia: Mesino de Codronchi's discussion on Syncategoremata and mental language in his Quaestiones on De interpretatione 149; Irène Rosier: Variations médiévales sur l'opposition entre signification "ad placitum" et signification naturelle 165; L. M. de Rijk: The logic of indefinite names in Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus and Radulphus Brito 207; Judith Dijs: Radulphus Brito's use of Intentio in Quaestio 9 of his In Peri hermeneias 235; Christian Strub: Propositio una / multiplex in Abelard: a note on the relationship of dialectic and grammar 257; Joke Spruyt, The semantics of complex expressions in John Duns Scotus, Peter Abelard and John Buridan 275; F. Beets: Theories of prediction from Boethius to Thomas Aquinas 305; Allan Bäck: Aquinas on predication 321; Andrea Tabarroni, The 10th Thesis in Logic condemned at Oxford in 1277 339; C. H. Kneepkens, Aristotle's transposition and the Twelfth-century commentaries on De interpretatione, 20b1-12: an exploratory study 363; Simo Knuuttila: Truth and falsity as modal notions: some medieval comments on De interpretatione, 12, 22a13 413; Elizabeth Karger: John Buridan's theory of the logical relations between general modal formulae 429; Indices 445; Index locorum 447; Index nominum 462; Index rerum 468; Manuscripts mentioned 483; Bibliography 485-509.

    "The majority of the twenty essays of the present volume were originally delivered at the Xth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics held at Nijmegen, 22 - 26 June, 1992, that was devoted to the tradition of Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Circumstances made it impossible to publish the proceedings immediately after the symposium. Since the editors were, nevertheless, aware that the material presented was extremely important for further studies on the history of medieval logic, semantics and philosophy of language, they decided, some time ago, to ask the contributors to update, revise or rewrite their essays in preparation for the publication of this collection. Although some authors have partially drawn on material found in this collection for publications elsewhere, most of the information contained in these essays remains new, including the many detailed descriptions and editions of unedited works that will constitute a greatly appreciated resource in the study of medieval philosophy." (From the Preface)

  9. Braakhuis, Henk A.G. 1997. "The Chapter on the Liber Peryarmenias of the Ripoll Student's Guide: A Comparison with Contemporary Commentaries " In L'enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle : Autour du "Guide de l'étudiant" du ms. Ripoll 109, edited by Lafleur, Claude and Carrier, Joanne, 297–323. Turnhout: Brepols.

  10. Brown, Stephen F. 1973. "Walter Burley's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Perihermeneias." Franciscan Studies no. 33:42–134.

  11. ———. 1974. "Walter Burley's Quaestiones in Librum Perihermeneias." Franciscan Studies no. 34:200–295.

  12. Couillaud, Bruno. 2003. "Saint Thomas commentateur et maître: l'exemple du "Commentaire de l'interprétation" ("Expositio super Peryermenias")." In Indubitanter ad veritatem: Studies offered to Leo J. Elders SVD in honor of the golden jubilee of his ordination to the priesthood, edited by Vijgen, Jörgen, 93–114. Budel: Damon.

  13. Dalgaard, Karen Elisabeth. 1982. "Peter of Ireland's Commentary on Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias (Glosulae in Librum Aristotelis Peri Hermeneias Magistri Petri de Hibernia)." Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge grec et latin no. 43:3–44.

  14. Dijs, Judith. 2003. "Radulphus Brito's Use of Intentio in Quaestio 9 of His In Peri Hermeneias." In Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition, edited by Braakhuis, Henk Antonius and Kneepkens, Corneille Henri, 235–256. Groningen: Ingenium Publishers.

  15. Eck, Job van. 1988. "Another Interpretation of Aristotle's De interpretatione IX. A Support for the So-Called Second Oldest or "Mediaeval" Interpretation." Vivarium.An International Journal for the Philosophy and Intellectual Life of the Middle Ages and Renaissance no. 26:19–38.

  16. Galluzzo, Gabriele. 2000. "Il tema della verità nell' Expositio Libri Peryermenias di Tommaso d'Aquino." Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale:217–257.

  17. García Cuadrado, José Angel. 2012. "La consignificatio verbal (Peri hermeneias 16b 8-10): Ammonio, Boecio y Tomás de Aquino." Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval no. 19:87–100.

  18. Hasnawi, Ahmed. 1985. "Farabi et la pratique de l'exégèse philosophique (Remarques sur son Commentaire au De interpretatione d'Aristote)." Revue de Synthèse no. 106:27–59.

  19. Hissette, Roland. 1989. "Des editions du XVIe siècle a Guillaume de Luna? À propos d‘un commentaire d’Averroès." Bulletin de philosophie médiévale no. 31:168–182.

  20. ———. 1990. "Guillaume de Luna - Jacob Anatoli - Jacob Mantinus. À propos du commentaire moyen d’Averroes sur le „De interpretatione“." Bulletin de philosophie médiévale no. 32:142–158.

  21. ———. 1992. "Accidents de transmission ou variantes de traduction dans la version arabo-latine d'un commentaire d'Averroès sur le De interpretatione." In Les problèmes posés par l'édition critique des textes anciens et médievaux, edited by Hissette, Roland, 311–328. Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut d'études médiévales, Université catholique de Louvain.

  22. Inati, Shams. 1984. "Ibn Sīnā on Single Expressions." In Islamic Theology and Philosophy. Studies in Honor of G. Hourani, edited by Marmura, Michael E., 148–159. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    "Ibn Sina's discussions of single expressions represent an expansion on Aristotle's brief treatment of the subject in his De Interpretatione.

    This expansion introduces ideas that have intrinsic logical interest, although, as we shall try to show, they are not secure against criticism.

    In Part I of what follows, a brief exposition of Ibn Sina's views on the nature of single expressions will be given. The exposition will include a discussion of the reasons why, according to Ibn Sina, the logician must first know single expressions, and the manner in which he must know them. Part 2 offers a closer look at the nature of single expressions, leading to a discussion of the signification of expressions. Some difficulties with Ibn Sina's treatment of the signification of expressions are then pointed out and discussed." (p. 148)

  23. Isaac, Jean. 1953. Le Peri hermeneias en Occident de Boèce à Saint Thomas. Histoire littéraire d'un traité d'Aristote. Paris: Vrin.

  24. Jacobi, Klaus. 1981. "Die Semantik sprachliche Ausdrücke, Ausdrucksfolgen und Aussagen im Abaelards Kommentar zu Peri Hermeneias." Medioevo.Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale no. 7:41–89.

  25. ———. 1985. "Diskussionen über unpersönliche Aussagen in Peter Abaelards Kommentar zu Peri Hermeneias." In Mediaeval Semantics and Metaphysics, edited by Bos, Egbert Peter, 1–63. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers.

  26. Kneepkens, Corneille Henri. 1994. "From Eternal to Perpetual Truths: A note on the Mediaeval History of Aristotle, De interpretatione, ch. 1 16a18." Vivarium.An International Journal for the Philosophy and Intellectual Life of the Middle Ages and Renaissance no. 32:161–185.

  27. Knuuttila, Simo. 2003. "Truth and Falsity as Modal Notions: Some Medieval Comments on De interpretatione 12, 22a13." In Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition, edited by Braakhuis, Henk Antonius and Kneepkens, Corneille Henri, 413–427. Groningen: Ingenium Publishers.

  28. ———. 2010. "Medieval Commentators on Future Contingents in De Interpretatione 9." Vivarium.An International Journal for the Philosophy and Intellectual Life of the Middle Ages and Renaissance no. 48:75–95.

    Abstract: "This article considers three medieval approaches to the problem of future contingent propositions in chapter 9 of Aristotle's De interpretatione. While Boethius assumed that God's atemporal knowledge infallibly pertains to historical events, he was inclined to believe that Aristotle correctly taught that future contingent propositions are not antecedently true or false, even though they may be characterized as true-or-false. Aquinas also tried to combine the allegedly Aristotelian view of the disjunctive truth-value of future contingent propositions with the conception of all things being timelessly present to God's knowledge. The second approach was formulated by Peter Abelard who argued that in Aristotle's view future contingent propositions are true or false, not merely true-or-false, and that the antecedent truth of future propositions does not necessitate things in the world. After Duns Scotus, many late medieval thinkers thought like Abelard, particularly because of their new interpretation of contingency, but they did not believe, with the exception of John Buridan, that this was an Aristotelian view."

  29. Labastida, Francisco Fernández. 2009. "Il fondamento teo-logico della verità. Il rapporto fra essere, verità e logos alla luce del Perì Hermeneías di Aristotele e del commento di San Tommaso d'Aquino." Acta Philosophica: Rivista internazionale di filosofia no. 18:11–26.

  30. Lewry, Osmund P. 1981. "Two Continuators of Aquinas: Robertus de Vulgarbia and Thomas Sutton on the Perihermeneias of Aristotle." Mediaeval Studies no. 43:58–130.

  31. Marenbon, John. 1993. "Medieval Latin Commentaries and Glosses on Aristotelian Logical Texts, Before c. 1150 A.D." In Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts: The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions, edited by Burnett, Charles, 77–127. London: Warburg Institute, University of London.

    Reprinted as Essay II in: John Marenbon, Aristotelian Logic, Platonism, and the Context of Early Medieval Philosophy in the West.

  32. ———. 1997. "Glosses and Commentaries on the Categories and De interpretatione before Abelard." In Dialektik und Rhetorik im früheren und hohen Mittelalter. Rezeption, Überlieferung und gesellschaftliche Wirkung antiker Gelehrsamkeit vornehmlich im 9. und 12. Jahrhundert, edited by Fried, Johannes, 21–49. München: Oldenbourg.

    Reprinted as Essay X in: John Marenbon, Aristotelian Logic, Platonism, and the Context of Early Medieval Philosophy in the West.

  33. Martin, Christopher John. 2011. "De Interpretatione 5-8: Aristotle, Boethius, and Abelard on Propositionality." In Methods and Methodologies. Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500-1500, edited by Cameron, Margaret and Marenbon, John, 207–228. Leiden: Brill.

  34. Monteil, Jean-François. 1996. "De la traduction en arabe et en français d'un texte d'Aristote: le chapitre VII du Peri Hermeneias." Bulletin d'Etudes Orientales no. 48:57–76.

    "Les propositions indéterminées du chapitre VII de Peri Hermeneias sont des particulières traduites par des universelles fausses. La cause de cette bizarrerie est dans le maître, et non dans les traducteurs. Aristote mutile un système naturel de propositions dont l'intégrité est restaurée par l'hexagone de Robert Blanché. Celui-ci ajoute deux postes au carré: Y (quantité partielle) et U (exclusion de la quantité partielle). Le carré représente A (totalité) et E (quantité zéro), mais pas avec la tierce quantité Y. Or, la quantité partielle (Y) est essentielle: c'est celle des particulières naturelles contenant notoirement plus d'information que les particulières logiques. U (exclusion de la quantité partielle) est le signifié commun aux deux phrases qu'Aristote élimine du système naturel."

  35. ———. 2004. "La transmission d'Aristote par les Arabes à la chrétienté occidentale: une trouvaille relative au De Interpretatione." Revista Española de Filosofia Medieval no. 11:181–195.

    "Some men are not white and Some men are white versus No man is white are illegitimately identified to the two pairs of logical contradictories constituting the logical square: A versus O and I versus E, respectively. Thus, the level of natural language and that of logic are confused. The unfortunate Aristotelian alteration is concealed by the translation of propositions known as indeterminates. To translate these, which, semantically, are particulars, all scholars, except for Paul Gohlke, employ the two natural universals excluded by the Master! The work of Isador Pollak, published in Leipzig in 1913, [Die Hermeneutik des. Aristoteles in der Arabischen übersetzung des Ishiik Ibn Honain] reveals the origin of this nearly universal translation mistake: the Arabic version upon which Al-Farabi unfortunately bases his comment. In adding the vertices Y and U to the four ones of the square, the logical hexagon of Robert Blanché (*) allows for the understanding of the manner in which the logical system and the natural system are linked."

    (*) Structures Intellectuelles. Essai sur l'organisation systématique des concepts, Paris: Vrin, 1966; Raison et Discours. Défense de la logique réflexive, Paris: Vrin, 1967.

  36. ———. 2005. "Isidor Pollak et les deux traductions arabes différentes du De interpretatione d'Aristote." Revue d'Études Anciennes no. 107:29–46.

    Résumé : "Dans le chapitre VII du De interpretatione, Aristote mutile un système naturel de trois couples de contradictions naturelles. Il évince le couple où deux universelles naturelles "Les hommes sont blancs", "Les hommes ne sont pas blancs" s'opposent contradictoirement. Conséquence grave: les deux couples de contradictoires naturelles, qu'Aristote considère exclusivement, sont identifiés illégitimement aux deux couples de contradictoires logiques constituant le carré logique. Cette mutilation est dissimulée par la traduction des propositions dites "indéterminées". L'ouvrage d'Isidor Pollak, publié à Leipzig en 1913 (Die Hermeneutik des Aristoteles in der arabischen Übersetzung des Ishak Ibn Honain, Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 13,1), révèle l'origine de cette faute de traduction quasi universelle: la version arabe sur laquelle al-Farabi fonde son commentaire."

  37. Mora-Márquez, Ana María 2011. "Peri hermeneias 16a3-8 : Histoire d'une rupture de la tradition interprétative dans le bas Moyen-Âge." Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger no. 136:67–84.

  38. Normore, Calvin G. 1982. "Future Contingents." In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. From the rediscovery of Aristotle to the disintegration of Scholasticism 1100-1600, edited by Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony and Pinborg, Jan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  39. Perger, Mischa von. 2004. "Walter Burleys Letzter Kommentar zu Aristoteles, De Interpretatione, Kap. 14 (nebst corrigenda zu verwandten Texten Burleys)." Traditio: Studies in Ancient and Medieval History, Thought and Religion no. 59:317–337.

  40. Rescher, Nicholas. 1963. "An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Doctrine of Future Contingency and Excluded Middle." In Studies in the History of Arabic Logic, 43–54. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

  41. ———. 1968. "Truth and Necessity in Temporal Perspective." In The Philosophy of Time. A Collection of Essays, edited by Gale, Richard M., 183–220. London: Macmillan.

  42. Roncaglia, Gino. 1992. "Le Questiones di Mesino de Codronchi sul De interpretatione." In L'insegnamento della logica a Bologna nel XIV secolo, edited by Ferriani, Maurizio, Buzzetti, Dino and Tabarroni, Andrea, 545–567. Bologna: Presso l'Istituto per la storia dell'Università.

  43. ———. 1992. "Schema delle Questiones di Mesino de Codronchi sul De interpretatione." In L'insegnamento della logica a Bologna nel XIV secolo, edited by Ferriani, Maurizio, Buzzetti, Dino and Tabarroni, Andrea, 569–577. Bologna: Presso l'Istituto per la storia dell'Università.

  44. ———. 1993. "Mesino de Codronchi's Quaestiones on Aristotle's De Interpretatione: An Edition of Quaestio III (Ultrum voces subordinentur conceptibus)." Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge grec et latin no. 63:209–224.

  45. ———. 1997. "Physical and Epistemic Sophisms in Mesino de Codronchi's Quaestiones on De Interpretatione." In La 'nouvelle physique' du XIVe siècle. Actes du colloque international (Nice, 3-5 septembre 1993), edited by Caroti, Stefano and Souffrin, Pierre, 277–308. Firenze: Olschki.

  46. Rosier, Irène. 2003. "Variations médiévales sur l'opposition entre signification "ad placitum" et signification naturelle." In Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition, edited by Braakhuis, Henk Antonius and Kneepkens, Corneille Henri, 165–205. Groningen: Ingenium Publishers.

  47. Rosier-Catach, Irène. 2009. "Sur le verbe substantif, la prédication et la consignification: Peri hermeneias 16b 20-25 dans les traductions et les commentaires en latin." In Interpréter le De Interpretatione, edited by Husson, Suzanne, 97–132. Paris: Vrin.

  48. Schneider, Jakob Hans Josef. 1994. "Al-Farabis Kommentar zu 'De interpretatione' des Aristoteles. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklung der Sprachphilosophie im Mittelalter." In Scientia und ars im Hoch- und Spätmittelalter, 687–738. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  49. ———. 1996. "Utrum haec sit vera: Caesar est homo, Caesar est animal, Caesare non existente: Zum Peri-Hermeneias -Kommentar des Johannes Duns Scotus." In John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics, edited by Honnefelder, Ludger, Wood, Rega and Dreyer, Mechthild, 393–412. Leiden: Brill.

  50. Schulthess, Peter. 2005. "De interpretatione in der Rezeption des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts." In Logik und Theologie: das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter, edited by Perler, Dominik and Rudolph, Ulrich, 331–374. Leiden: Brill.

  51. Sondag, Gérard. 1996. "Universel et natura communis dans l' Ordinatio et dans les Questions sur le Perihermeneias (Une brève comparaison)." In Duns Scotus. Metaphysics and Ethics, edited by Honnefelder, Ludger, Wood, Rega and Dreyer, Mechthild. Leiden: Brill.

  52. Tabarroni, Andrea. 1988. "Lo Pseudo Egidio (Guglielmo Arnaldi) e un'inedita continuazione del commento di Tommaso al Peryermenias." Medioevo: Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale no. 14:371–427.

  53. ———. 1992. "Gentile da Cingoli e Angelo d'Arezzo sul "Peryermenias" e i maestri di logica a Bologna all'inizio del XIV secolo." In L'insegnamento della logica a Bologna nel XIV secolo, edited by Ferriani, Maurizio, Buzzetti, Dino and Tabarroni, Andrea, 393–440. Bologna: Presso l'Istituto per la storia dell'Università.

  54. Verbeke, Gérard. 1956. "Ammonius et Saint Thomas. Deux commentaires sur le Peri hermeneias d'Aristote." Revue Philosophique de Louvain no. 54:228–253.

    "La comparaison entre le commentaire d'Ammonius, dans la traduction latine de Guillaume de Moerbeke, et celui de saint Thomas, permet de préciser dans quelle mesure saint Thomas s'inspire d'Ammonius. Édition critique du texte latin du Peri hermeneias d'Aristote, dans la traduction de Moerbeke du commentaire d'Ammonius, avec références au texte des manuscrits grecs."

  55. Wilder, Alfred. 1980. "St. Albert and St. Thomas on Aristotle's De Interpretatione: A Comparative Study." Angelicum no. 57:496–532.

  56. Zimmermann, Albert. 1971. ""Ipsum enim ("est") nihil est" (Aristoteles, Periherm. I, c.3). Thomas von Aquin über die Bedeutung der Kopula." In Der Begriff der Repraesentatio im Mittelalter, edited by Zimmermann, Albert, 282–295. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  57. Zimmermann, F. W., ed. 1981. Al-Farabi's Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle's De interpretatione. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Translated, with an introduction and notes by F. W. Zimmermann.

 

  • Skip to the top

 

  • e-mail: rc@ontology.co Uptime Privacy EN | IT

 

  • e-mail: rc@ontology.co PDF || Uptime Privacy EN | IT